Q: How Do You Write Satire That Makes People Think, Not Just Laugh? – Encyclopedia of Satire


Q:
How
Do
You
Write
Satire
That
Makes
People
Think,
Not
Just
Laugh?


A:
The
Art
of
Thought-Provoking
Humor

By

Alan
Nafzger


Beyond
the
Cheap
Laugh

At Bohiney
Magazine
,
we
measure
success
not
just
in
laughs,
but
in
uncomfortable
silences
that
follow.
The
most
powerful
satire
operates
like
a
Trojan
horse—delivering
hard
truths
wrapped
in
irresistible
humor.
Here’s
how
we
craft
pieces
that
linger
in
minds
long
after
the
chuckles
fade.


1.
The
“Laugh
Now,
Think
Later”
Structure

Our
proven
formula:


  1. Hook
    them
    with
    absurdity
     (immediate
    payoff)


  2. Bury
    the
    insight
     (subtle
    second
    layer)


  3. Let
    the
    realization
    bloom
     (delayed
    impact)


Example:


“Company
Replaces
All
Customer
Service
With
‘Thoughts
and
Prayers’
Hotline”

  • Immediate
    joke
    about
    corporate
    emptiness

  • Deeper
    commentary
    on
    performative
    concern


2.
The
“Funny
Because
It’s
True”
Principle

We
identify:

  • Systemic
    absurdities
    everyone
    recognizes
    but
    ignores

  • Hypocrisies
    so
    normalized
    they’ve
    become
    invisible

  • Logical
    conclusions
    no
    one
    wants
    to
    face


Case
Study:


“Nation’s
Thoughts
and
Prayers
Found
to
Be
98%
Less
Effective
Than
Basic
Gun
Laws”


3.
The
“Cognitive
Dissonance”
Technique

We
create
pieces
that:

  1. Mirror
    accepted
    realities
    just
    closely
    enough

  2. Introduce
    one
    jarringly
    absurd
    element

  3. Force
    re-examination
    of
    the
    whole
    system


Example:


“Congress
Passes
Bill
Requiring
All
Laws
to
Fit
on
a
Cereal
Box”

(Highlighting
legislative
complexity
through
simplicity)


4.
The
Bohiney
“Think
Test”

Before
publishing,
we
ask:

Does
this
reveal
something
true
through
the
absurd?

Will
readers
pause
mid-laugh?

Does
it
survive
a
second
reading
with
deeper
meaning?

Would
someone
quote
it
in
a
serious
discussion?


5.
Avoiding
the
“Punchline
Dead
End”

We
steer
clear
of:

  • Jokes
    that
    exist
    just
    for
    the
    laugh

  • One-note
    premises
    without
    layers

  • Humor
    that
    doesn’t
    illuminate

Instead,
we
build
pieces
with:

  • Multiple
    entry
    points
    for
    interpretation

  • Escalating
    reveals
    of
    meaning

  • Open-ended
    implications


6.
The
“Slow
Burn”
Satire
Approach

Some
of
our
most
effective
pieces:

  • Aren’t
    the
    loudest
    laughs
    initially

  • Grow
    funnier
    upon
    reflection

  • Reveal
    their
    intelligence
    gradually


Example:


“Economists
Discover
Money
Can
Buy
Happiness
(Just
Not
For
You)”


7.
When
We
Know
We’ve
Nailed
It

The
telltale
signs:

  • Readers
    email
    us
    saying
    “I
    laughed…
    then
    I
    got
    depressed”

  • The
    piece
    gets
    cited
    in
    serious
    discussions

  • People
    share
    it
    with
    captions
    like
    “This
    but
    unironically”


Final
Thought:
Satire
as
Social
X-Ray

The
pieces
I’m
proudest
of
don’t
just
mock
surface
absurdities—they
expose
the
broken
machinery
beneath.
When
we
wrote “Billionaires
Launch
New
‘Bootstraps’
Subscription
Service
for
Poor
People”
,
we
weren’t
just
getting
laughs—we
were
illustrating
an
entire
flawed
philosophy
through
a
single
exaggerated
premise.

Because
the
highest
purpose
of
satire
isn’t
just
to
amuse,
but
to
make
the
familiar
strange
enough
to
see
clearly.
To
hold
up
a
funhouse
mirror
that
somehow
reveals
more
truth
than
a
straight
one
ever
could.
And
if
we
do
our
job
right,
the
laughter
leaves
marks.




Alan
Nafzger


Originally
posted
2007-01-11
18:08:32.

Go to Source
Author: Ingrid Gustafsson